- Monthly visits
- 190.2K
- Down13.6%MoMSep 2026
- Public revenue
- Undisclosed
- No public revenue evidence yet
- Entry price
- Free
- No monthly subscription pricing
- Launched
- 16mo ago
- 2025-07-31 · Est.
Traffic
Marketing moves
Launches, search & content, referrals, promotions- SWE-sweep, SWEeper-bench, now PROBE. Many coding benchmarks in the past year have gone in the direction of proposing harder versions of tasks w/ fundamentally the same SWE-bench style formulation. In comparison, proactivity is a great dir
@jyangballin · 2026-10-28 · 32 likes · 1 reposts · 2,347 views
- Another awesome case study of multi-agent systems evaluated on ProgramBench (MAS on PB). Kudos to the DeLM team! It's been really interesting to see how recent proposals for MAS on PB (e.g., Agensh, Opus 5.5/5/4.8/4.7 model cards, Factory'
@jyangballin · 2026-10-08 · 26 likes · 3 reposts · 2,499 views
- Ever since creating SWE-bench Multimodal w/ @closji, I've kept my eye out for multimodal coding. This looks like a *great* one. First of hopefully many benchmarks showcasing how we can use code to simulate and interact w/ the real world 引
@jyangballin · 2026-10-06 · 50 likes · 3 reposts · 3,336 views
Launched on Show HN (5 pts · 1 comments)Launch
Randomly switching between LMs at every step boosts SWE-bench score — What if your agent uses a different LM at every turn? We let mini-SWE-agent randomly switch between GPT-5 and Sonnet 4 and it scored highe…
Aug 20, 2025 · 15mo agoLaunch page
Launched on Show HN (2 pts)Launch
New SWE-bench leaderboard compares LMs without fancy agent scaffolds — Hello from the SWE-bench/SWE-agent team at Princeton/Stanford. When we created the SWE-bench benchmark in 2023 from hundreds of real-life…
Jul 31, 2025 · 16mo agoLaunch page
Third-party reviews & case dossiers
Acquisition breakdowns, engineer reviews & open-source metrics- Post excerpt:
- Hello from the SWE-bench/SWE-agent team at Princeton/Stanford. When we created the SWE-bench benchmark in 2023 from hundreds of real-life GitHub issues/pull requests, the highest score was just a couple of percent. The tasks were so challenging for LMs, that most people didn't even want to work on them. Half a year later, SWE-agent showed that the early 2024
- Post excerpt:
- What if your agent uses a different LM at every turn? We let mini-SWE-agent randomly switch between GPT-5 and Sonnet 4 and it scored higher on SWE-bench than with either model separately. GPT-5 by itself gets 65.0%, Sonnet 4 64.8%, but randomly switching at every step gets us 67.2% This result came pretty surprising to us. There's a few more experiments in t
Open Source & Self-Hosting
- GitHub Stars
- Public repo
- Forks
- —
- License
- See repository
- Primary language
- —
Traffic sources
Traffic breakdown
Channels
- Organic Search63%
- Direct24%
- Referrals8%
- AI Assistants4%
- Other1%
Countries
- United States19%
- China14%
- Russia11%
- Germany5%
- India4%
Search
Domain authority —Domain registered 2023-09-09
| Keyword | Monthly volume |
|---|---|
| swe bench | 17.2K |
| swe-bench | 7,520 |
| swe-bench verified | 3,830 |
| swebench | 3,400 |
| swe benchmark | 2,800 |
Traffic data: Vaneform
Pricing
Pricing page not identified yet, or no public pricing listed.
Pages & changes
Key pages
Weekly snapshots- Homewww.swebench.com/
- Featureswww.swebench.com/index.html Snapshot 2026-11-03
Changes
Design
Enterprise Clean (Light canvas, dense density) featuring full-bleed canvas / video / 3d layout and product ui screenshot / component visuals.
First-screen preview · click to zoom
First-screen pitch & conversion flow
“Official Leaderboards”
Full-Bleed Canvas / Video / 3D hero structure paired with direct input / instant try CTA and user count, rating, or key metrics.
Conversion path: Full-Bleed Canvas / Video / 3D + Product UI Screenshot / Component → Direct Input / Instant Try · Trust bar: User Count, Rating, or Key Metrics
- Category Positioning Anchor
- Metrics Strip
Palette · click to copy
- Typography
- 7.0
- Color & Contrast
- 7.0
- Layout & Spacing
- 7.0
- Craft & Polish
- 7.0
- Distinctiveness
- 5.0
Structure
- Fonts
- Inter
- Hero layout
- Full-Bleed Canvas / Video / 3D
- Primary visual
- Product UI Screenshot / Component
- Conversion CTA
- Direct Input / Instant Try
- Social proof
- User Count, Rating, or Key Metrics
- Navigation
- Left App Sidebar
- Theme & density
- Light · Dense
- Corners & depth
- Small Radius · Hairline borders
Preview full AI design brief (includes :root CSS variables & layout rules)Style tokens only; never copy brand names, logos, copy, or images
# Design Brief: Enterprise Clean (with Minimal Monochrome)
Trustworthy blue-anchored palette, structured grids, and prominent customer logo walls.
## Design Tokens
```css
:root {
--background: #f4f6f8;
--surface: #ffffff;
--foreground: #1c1e21;
--muted-foreground: #6b7280;
--accent: #1d6fea;
--radius: 4px;
--font-heading: "Inter", ui-sans-serif, system-ui, sans-serif;
--font-body: "Inter", ui-sans-serif, system-ui, sans-serif;
}
```
Color area ratio: Background #F4F6F8 (~42%) · Surface #FFFFFF (~36%) · Text #1C1E21 (~10%) · Muted Text #6B7280 (~7%) · Accent #1D6FEA (~5%). Background and surface dominate the canvas; reserve the accent color for primary buttons and active states.
## Layout & Conversion Structure
- Hero layout: Full-Bleed Canvas / Video / 3D
- Navigation: Left App Sidebar
- Theme & density: Light · Dense
- Border radius & elevation: Small Radius; no drop shadows—separate layers with hairline borders and whitespace
- Primary visual medium: Product UI Screenshot / Component
- Conversion CTA: Direct Input / Instant Try · Trust bar uses User Count, Rating, or Key Metrics
- Headline hook: Category Positioning Anchor
- Hero components: Metrics Strip
- Spatial layout notes: Full-Bleed Canvas / Video / 3D hero structure paired with direct input / instant try CTA and user count, rating, or key metrics.
- Visual summary: Enterprise Clean (Light canvas, dense density) featuring full-bleed canvas / video / 3d layout and product ui screenshot / component visuals.
## Avoid
- Experimental navigation patterns
- Low-legibility decorative fonts
- Visual novelty that obscures the value proposition
Implement the UI following the design tokens and layout specifications above: use only these color variables, and reserve the accent color strictly for primary actions and active states. Adopt only this visual style—never copy any reference product’s brand name, logo, copy, or imagery.
Questions & evidence
- How much website traffic does SWE-bench get?
- Vaneform estimates 190.2K website visits in 2026-09. Visits can include repeat visits; this estimate measures web traffic separately from paying customers or revenue.Source
- What is SWE-bench and what platforms does it support?
- SWE-bench is catalogued under Testing & Code Quality: Official Leaderboards. Supported platforms: Web.
Related products in this category
These products share a catalog category. Compare customer tasks, features and deployment requirements before treating them as alternatives.
| Product | Entry price | Visits | Revenue |
|---|---|---|---|
| PostmanAPI engineering for your agents | $9/mo | 2.7M | Undisclosed |
| ApplauseSoftware Testing Reimagined for the Age of AI | — | 1.2M | Undisclosed |
| PlaywrightPlaywright enables reliable web automation for testing, scripting, and AI agents. | — | 1.1M | Undisclosed |
| BrowserStackEverything you need for testing | $375/mo | 1M | Undisclosed |
| TestMu AIAssure your AI deployment - across enterprise and real world | $19/mo | 796.4K | Undisclosed |
| BetterBugsBug Reporting | $12/mo | 663.3K | Undisclosed |